Difference between revisions of "Glitch Theories"

From ZeldaChaos
Jump to: navigation, search
(Adding sigs reminder.)
m (Adding a few more minor things. Then this page would be officially opened for business! :D)
 
Line 20: Line 20:
 
*...
 
*...
  
(Theorized by: Glitching Legacy)
+
=== Credits ===
(Posted by: [[User:Glitching Legacy|Glitching Legacy]] ([[User talk:Glitching Legacy|talk]]) 18:06, 23 December 2013 (EST))
+
*(Theorized by: Glitching Legacy)
 +
*(Posted by: [[User:Glitching Legacy|Glitching Legacy]] ([[User talk:Glitching Legacy|talk]]) 18:06, 23 December 2013 (EST))
  
 
Here's how it should be formatted: (Note that when typing it, you don't insert the parenthesis)
 
Here's how it should be formatted: (Note that when typing it, you don't insert the parenthesis)
Line 37: Line 38:
 
(List the notes, if any)
 
(List the notes, if any)
  
(Theorized by: (user))
+
(===) Credits (===)
(Posted by: (user))
+
(*)(Theorized by: (user))
 +
(*)(Posted by: (user))
 +
 
 +
One more note. If you choose to test a theory, say that you are testing the theory in the Talk Page. Feel free to revise the theories if you disprove it, but PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THE ORIGINAL POST OF THAT THEORY!!! Instead, under the credits of the original theory, add "Disproved by: (Your name or disprover's name)" Then if you have a new process of testing that same theory, add it as a new theory with the title being the same title as the original, but add "REVISED" at the end of the title. Doing this would really make this whole thing a lot less confusing!
  
 
__FORCETOC__
 
__FORCETOC__
  
 
= Theories =
 
= Theories =

Latest revision as of 23:15, 23 December 2013

Contents

[edit] Guidelines

This is where users can post theories for possible glitches. These possible glitches must be useful in at least 1 way, but they don't have to be speed run legal. They just need to be fun! That's all! Here's an example:

[edit] Twilight Princess: Example

[edit] Instructions

  1. Do this.
  2. Do that.
  3. Then this.
  4. Then that.
  5. Finally, ...

[edit] Possible Results

This might happen, which might cause this. And so on...

[edit] Notes

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...

[edit] Credits

  • (Theorized by: Glitching Legacy)
  • (Posted by: Glitching Legacy (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2013 (EST))

Here's how it should be formatted: (Note that when typing it, you don't insert the parenthesis)


(==) (Game the theory is for) : (Name of theory) (==)

(===) Instructions (===) (List the instructions for testing the theory)

(===) Possible Results (===) (Type what may or may not happen and, if known, why it may or may not happen)

(===) Notes (===) (List the notes, if any)

(===) Credits (===) (*)(Theorized by: (user)) (*)(Posted by: (user))

One more note. If you choose to test a theory, say that you are testing the theory in the Talk Page. Feel free to revise the theories if you disprove it, but PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THE ORIGINAL POST OF THAT THEORY!!! Instead, under the credits of the original theory, add "Disproved by: (Your name or disprover's name)" Then if you have a new process of testing that same theory, add it as a new theory with the title being the same title as the original, but add "REVISED" at the end of the title. Doing this would really make this whole thing a lot less confusing!


[edit] Theories

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Glitches
Navigation
Affiliates
Toolbox
Google AdSense