Talk:Glitch Theories

Really a use?

Is there really a use to this? I remember some pages having theories about why the glitch happens themselves, sometimes under the notes section, but i have seen a explanation section sometimes. So is this actually having a use?

I believe so. I'm a glitch theorist, so I know that theories can be helpful. Here's how theories may come in handy: 1) Users can test theories they find interesting and, maybe, just maybe, it might become a new glitch, 2) Users would be able to do more than just glitch games. I, as an experienced Zelda glitcher and theorist, know that I could use the explanation of a glitch to produce a theory based on the information in the explanation. 3) It would give users a little more to do on this site. Everyone on this site wishes it would more active. I'm sure you do, too. 4) Lastly, it would be able to give those who produced the theories a chance at fame. I already have enough fame for glitching (for proof, visit my page and look at my discovered glitches), but I want others to feel the fame. I know lots of glitches, but I can't post them anywhere except in the forums, but the forums aren't that active, so I want a place a little more active. In the forums, I'm Theory Legacy. Honestly, do you really think that the Glitches by Area pages are such a good idea? I think it's just another way to categorize glitches, but it's been being treated as though it were a great thing. I'm sorry if you don't like theories, but I like them and I know others do too. Glitching Legacy (talk) 20:22, 28 December 2013 (EST)